LINKS

SITES ABOUT THE ASTROLOGY OF ASTEROIDS

http://www.zanestein.com/chiron_a.htm

http://www.expreso.co.cr/centaurs/

http://www.delaneyastroscope.com/

http://www.geocities.com/mahtezcatpoc/



(Something may be still omitted, but without intention).

_________________________________________________


REFERENCES ABOUT PLATE TECTONICS

Some links are suggested for a whole description of plate tectonics process,
although still not exhaustively:


http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer.php?mid=66

http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer.php?mid=69

http://www.solarviews.com/eng/earthint.htm

http://facstaff.bloomu.edu/lhtann/Lecture4.htm

http://geology.csupomona.edu/drjessey/class/Gsc101/Plate.html


http://geology.about.com/library/bl/blnutshell_plate-tec.htm


http://www.firstscience.com/SITE/ARTICLES/continents.asp


http://www.moorlandschool.co.uk/earth/tectonic.htm#Jigsaw


http://www.phy6.org/earthmag/mill_6.htm


http://www-class.unl.edu/geol101i/03_overview_plate_tectonics.htm


http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/plate-tectonics.html


http://webspinners.com/dlblanc/index.php


http://blue.utb.edu/paullgj/geol1404/lectures/plate_tectonics.html


http://www.extremescience.com/PlateTectonicsmap.htm

--------------------


Perhaps interesting too:

http://staff.jccc.net/pdecell/essays/sciencetxt.html

http://www.thebestlinks.com/Paradigm_shift.html

--------------------

AGAINST PLATE TECTONICS

All theories had/have contrasts by others, and Plate Tectonics is not an exception:

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/8098/1.htm#Intra-cratonic

http://www.expanding-earth.org/

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/tecto.htm

http://users.indigo.net.au/don/index.html

http://geology.about.com/od/platetectonics/a/aa071104a.htm

http://www.jpdawson.com/pelgnet/pelchap8/Chap8.html

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/EarthSciences.html

http://www.wincom.net/earthexp/n/crests.htm

http://www.flem-ath.com/solart1.htm

http://www.geologynet.com/tectonics1.htm

http://www.mantleplumes.org/Philosophy.html


This is usual in all sciences.  

E.g. Darwin's theory has a consequent "Neo-Darwinism" and Cuvier was against Darwin (Catastrophism versus Evolutionism).
In current times, nothing is changed: "Neo-Darwinism" has a strong opposition today, especially by "Creationism".
In Italy, Neo-Darwinism is yet deleted from study programs at elementary school.
Even if without to agree with theories that are different from Plate Tectonics,
such as the "Expanding Earth Theory", we have no problems about the suggested meaning of AW197, that may be in tune with these potential different paradigms.
Perhaps, additional keywords are possible.

__________________________